The Roving House The Roving House The Store Blog YouTube Channel Photos Contact Us

Chicago, NATO protest May 17-22, 2012 – Part two, Who’s streets?

May 31st, 2012

A march set off from the convergence center in northern Chicago on the night the buses from all over the country arrived, taking to the surrounding neighborhood streets. The next morning was the big union nurses rally, with Tom Morello, which turned into an impromptu march through DT chicago when a medic with his face covered was arrested for failing to reveal himself. The march then snaked through downtown before being cut off and dispersed on a bridge. From the bridge the march headed to the FED, before stopping at Grant Park, where a GA was held while a good number of protestors joined an ongoing 9 year old picket line in front of the Congress Hotel on Michigan Ave.

1/3

2/3

3/3

Chicago, NATO protest, May 17-22 Documentary. Part One;Getting there.

May 26th, 2012

I hope to edit down my footage from the Chicago NATO protests of May 17-22, 2012 over the next few days, releasing sections as a serialized documentary as I learn how to edit. So please, check back in every day or so until the story is told.

(1/2)

(2/2)

On the occupation which has taken up the Massachusettes State House steps.

April 9th, 2012

Since the fall of the Occupy Camp at Dewey Square, which held for 71 days in the shadow of the Boston Federal Reserve building outside of the doors of South Station, a contingent of activists and community members have focused their energy and planning on the debt and budgeting controversy surrounding the MBTA. The group, calling themselves Occupy the MBTA, staged demonstrations as well as organized canvasing missions in which activists and community members rode the subway handing out literature and engaging other riders on the impending proposed band-aid solutions, layoffs, line cuts, fare increases, and further debt shuffling to come as “austerity” apparently becomes more than just the buzz word, but the application.

On Wednesday April fourth the MBTA’s Board of Directors voted yes to adopt a plan dubbeb the “third scenario” to close their $161 million dollar deficit in their 1.7 billion dollar annual operating budget for 2013; including service cuts and a 23% average fare increase which many feel affect those in the lower income bracket, students, and elderly at a disproportionally higher rate than other riders with deeper pockets.

Much of the money collect on the fare from the 1.3 million daily riders goes to paying off the principal on the T’s 5.6 Billion debt, much of it money loaned to fund the “Big Dig” which has by-and-by been bought off by JP Morgan, Deutsche Bank, as well as others, so that, instead of the T being able to expand and thrive to service more riders as we move forward into the future, the MBTA will be forced to scale back, while more and more of the capital is sucked of by the blood sucking vampire squids, yet again.

Cue the Occupation, with these already debt saddled and marginalized groups being, yet again, targeted and raked over the coals by those granted authority to do so, so that, once again, some of the largest and most ruthless banks in the world can collect, it begins to makes sense that the sleeping bags and pillows have come out, and this time, there are demands; namely,
“No Hikes, No Cuts, No Layoffs!” as the rallying call, but further, and just as serious, “A fully -funded, sustainable, and affordable transportation plan that works for the entire 99% of Massachusetts.”
This is Massachusetts,… and as Grace Ross of the Green rainbow Party informed onlookers and activists on Saturday at a teach in at “Camp Charlie”, the name of the Occupy Encampment on the State House steps, we are the third riches state in the country, it isn’t that the money isn’t there, it is that we aren’t willing to go and get it from those who have it.

So, why a 10 day protest? Because April 14th is the last day that the state legislature can step in and veto the April 4th vote by the MBTA board of directors on the budget. What can you do? Come to the steps of the State House to find out, calendar at http://www.occupyboston.org/… or, as always, you can write your representative.

A controversial topic.

March 11th, 2012

This is something I have to say now.

I was once told something while hitchhiking that made my stomach hurt. A business guy in a convertible picked us up; a few hours into the ride he asked me,
“Can you guess what the next two big economic bubbles are going to be?”
“Probably green energy and biomedicine.” I said.
“I think green energy is right on.” He said, confidently. “And maybe biomedical. But, what I think is next, is going to make you sick” he said, smiling as he did, having gotten to know me a bit by then.
“Yeah, whats that?”
“Dissent.” he said flatly.

I laughed at him, but if he was right,… well, I do feel sick,… maybe that is the calloused to marketing pessimism in me speaking, but what I do know is that if he was correct it will be more than certainly be an ugly charade in the hands of the media and current market, but further and more importantly the duty of the networked, aware, organized and empathetic of society to expand and enlarge the activist/protest community, which is limited in it’s ability to change in that it is designed to bring attention to perceived and obvious wrongs, not offer solutions; those interested in creating a genuinely fairer society will need to start getting together, to be there; not to get rich and retire into some Ayn Randian valley at the end of a utopian silicon wrist band rainbow, but at the very least to make sure the ugliest sides of capitalism as normal don’t capitalize on and catch the zeitgeist into movement in corporate chains for any longer.

That said, since the end of the occupy encampment at Dewey Square most of my mental energy has revolved around the idea of what a voluntary worker/owner ran collective enterprise would look like, on a small and on a grand scale; as big as occupy, or bigger,…assuming the momentum which the movement had achieved to the point and transitioning into the next phase. A friend worded this concept of the next unifying tactic to me very succinctly, though he felt uncertain of what that tactic would be, by stating, that, ‘it was physically occupying land to have an open dialog with each other which had brought us all together in the first place; Occupying. It was just kind of there, and gave us a sort of purpose. It will have to be something, either that, or like that, which captures the momentum we have.’

I feel that for the movement take the fomentation of protest in all it’s fulminate and passionate best and bring that energy for change into the community, to create genuine change, we would need to create that change necessary in ourselves for a better society before we could ever achieve the society we feel entitled to. We have been paying into. The only way I can conceive to achieve this is through peer to peer to community interaction and exchange.

It seems to me we operate under an illusion currently, one that says if we all but purblindly toss our hope, votes, and taxes into an abysmally dark and deep rabbit hole of a system,..one so abstruse and seemingly unjust while ineffectually attempting to balance its entirety on,….profit,…not to float, not the ability to feed or educate,…

maybe starting today,…or soon, we could begin to gamble on each other, instead of paying someone else to care for us.

Now for some wild speculation.

What if occupy supporters created a corporate entity, which sought to fund raise, collectivize, acquire, and pool as much of the abandoned and blighted property in this country,..or world, as it could; as it’s plow.

With the property, the community and collective could use models of consensus to determine varying degrees of building use and sustainability;add complete transparency and neutrality based on gender, race, age, economic condition, creed, or any other system, and maybe we have?

Libraries,.. of books, tools, instruments, recording studios,… free schools. Cafes. Gardens. Theaters. All conceivable manner of public institution and service.

If pooled collectively, perhaps capital could be loaned, granted, or sought for affinity groups looking to form worker owned collective enterprises of their own. A people’s union.

As for the dreaded legal structure, I can at least imagine a corporation with thousands, or millions of board members, chairs rotating as fast as legally allowable, perhaps even fractions of seconds so everyone could be CEOs for a few minutes in their lives without the power to destroy or harm the orientation of the movement and mission; that, I at least hope, to be the liberation of as much life as possible without causing further undue harm to life on this or any planet.

Who knows what will become of tomorrow; all that can be known of now is that unless we still wish to be be enslaved then we must free ourselves today.

Be well.

A conversation about Occupy and the bankster scandal with former Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele.

January 19th, 2012

I met Michael Steel during the NH Primary at JD’s Tavern, the bar inside the Raddison Hotel, across the street from Veteran’s Park.

I was with a few Occupiers in the lobby when I saw Mr. Steele near the exit of the bar, and I told them I intended to ask him a question.

A couple of the occupiers walked over to introduced themselves, to break the ice and engage him about the movement.

At this point Mr. Steele said that he had always been very supportive of the occupy movement, since day one, adding that he saw an energy which the early days of the tea party had, and that he respects us for tackling the rampant corruption within our system. With that, I asked,

“Sir, I have a question for you on that note. Would you support the criminal prosecution of the top level banksters which made away with the american dream?”

He said that with criminal charges it could be a slippery slope, one we would need to be prepared for if we were to go down that road, and that he wouldn’t want to see anyone prosecuted for simply making a lot of money.

I pushed further, asking,

“What if it was proven that these banking executives wantonly abused systems with which they had privileged information on to the detriment of our entire society?”

“Well, if that was the case, then I would support it. But you need the evidence, show me the evidence.” Adding “You wont find it, because no one is looking for it.”

“Why not?” I asked.

“Because the system has a way of protecting itself.”

“Well, what should we do?” an occupier asked.

“Just keep doing what you are doing. You guys have it right.”