The Roving House The Roving House The Store Blog YouTube Channel Photos Contact Us

Archive for November, 2011

On the sweep of Los Angeles and Philadelphia, as well as the freeze out, in place in Boston.

Wednesday, November 30th, 2011

When I hear the mayor of Los Angeles, just this afternoon, commending and congratulating his navy blue soldiers, I realize their tactic; and again implore those able to step forward to help us solve these problems before it is too late.

Some of the very first things I had brought to Occupy Boston, besides books, was the need to come up with some kind of fire prevention, health, and public safety plan; something which could be easily absorbed and understood by all. It is my opinion that the single most important thing any occupation could focus on is public health and safety, as well as fire prevention and preparedness.

This task is and has been proving to be above my individual capacity, and I will speak frankly about my attempts to do so following, but not before noting that I speak for myself and my experience within Occupy Boston, and will not attempt to speculate on other occupations efforts, only on concerns made public.

On my first night in Dewey I realized the real flaw of the Occupy Boston site, when my door was flung open in the pouring rain by a man in a neon green vest, smelling of alcohol as he ushered in a few rain drenched, also alcohol breathed strangers.

“What is going on?” I asked, immediately as I woke.

“Safety” the man barked with a rough voice, continuing, “these people need to sleep in here.”

“This isn’t a sleeping tent. It is going to be the library in the morning.”

“Well, they are staying in here tonight.” he said, with finality. The problem was that those compassionate intelligent individuals who waxed philosophic joined working groups that served their interests, and not ones which best served the interests of the camp, itself.

Tactical Logistics, who worked on spatial arrangement and distribution of goods broke up into two new Working Groups, safety, and logistics, which could have basically been renamed supplies and security.

The first safety team, comprised mostly of homeless boston natives, acted out autocratically,imposing their own will on the residents, sometimes using violence, while maintaining a heavy buzz. It was a joke to most, and a serious portent to others that the only real requisites one needed to be on safety were an authoritarian complex and an alcohol or substance abuse problem.

Like brought like, soon the space filled with wayward souls and the job of spatial arrangement, for a while, fell on those in safety brusque enough to stake a tent brutally close to it’s new neighbor.

I would question them during my first week on site, watching the space grow painfully closer,
“Don’t you think there will need to have emergency exits?”
“Bro. Do you think anyone cares about that shit here? one safety member replied, “Besides, bro, there ain’t no more room,and they are part of the 99%, too, bro.”

Shortly into my stay with Occupy Boston I was handed a 2way radio by a member of the safety team, saying,
“You should have this.” it stayed on from then, almost constantly.

As more and more activists were turned down at logistics for lack of space, more and more of the cities marginalized began to show up, unafraid to squat or relocate an abandoned tent; some being those who had been turned down from all the shelters, or too proud or wily to ever even try.

As the rain came, me and several others would try and explain proper tarping, and drainage techniques; usually met with derision, until we would walk away, only to come back later to “autonomously cut their tarp” to better fit the foot print of the tent, which would allow water to drain to the ground, as opposed to channel itself under the tent.

The safety team almost entirely disbanded, save one previous member of the original team, almost two weeks after I arrived, so I joined.

In doing the first few over nights, I realized how out of control the problem had gotten; incident after incident, drug deals, to severe beatings, sexual harassment claims, to public urination/deification allegations and sightings.

I began to get on stack, to ask for fire extinguishers, two way radios, new communal tents, sanity, policy, volunteers, removal of entire areas of the camp; all which would pass, or else, and more common, we would lose quorem to decide upon,…still nothing has hit the ground; with the exception of the food tent,…two weeks late, and the good neighbor agreement, widely ignored.

Along with the medics the new safety team, which has since been more formally banded,with daily meetings, something which never happened with the old crew, began to take down tents which were serious health violations, mold,drug paraphernalia, caved in, etc,..

With this came a wave of backlash which was almost as bad as the conditions the tents themselves were having on the community; accusations of racism, fascism, elitism, to the point of parody.

It took weeks for the food tent, the canary in the coal mine, so we could gauge city reaction, while the remaining 4000 out of 5 allotted to the working group tent budget remained unspent; all the while everything from “winter tents” to pallets, shelving, and literally anything besides food or clothing, were being denied by the police at the gate, without escalation of protest from outside of Dewey, in. This simply must be an effort to freeze us out.

Every day the Fire department walks through, I great them when I can, and they point out new piles of materials, tarps, fabrics, anything,…they point out how closely aligned the tents are, cigarette burns on individual tents, and kinds of manner of etc,… and I tell them I will talk to the people in the tents; which i do.

Some help, they listen and they learn, others will assert their inalienable right to do whatever they want, whenever they want.

There is a man onsite who built himself a patio out of the gravel on the road, I told him,
“every shovel full of gravel in front of your tent is a puddle in the road every one uses.”
“Oh, don’t give me that bullshit. You little faggot peckerhead nazi’s ain’t going to tell me shit.”

Later that day one of the park directors approached him with the police superintendent as well as a sergeant; echoing my concerns on their own; all three were met with similar insults as I.

The rights of the individual on site at Occupy Boston still far supersede those of the group. On two consecutive nights the right to eject an individual for violence, threats of violence, and extreme substance abuse issues was turned down at the GA; one being the same man aforementioned.

When a person is asked not to smoke in their tent, the concerned will often be met with a,
“Fuck you.”

It is a more than unfortunate symptom of our current condition, people who have built up such a callous to advice, or the opinion of any other being, let alone a group; easily the embodiment, in a certain sense, of everything the movement is fighting against; this mean and vile condition, perhaps self willed, perhaps cast down from high, trickled all the way down; selfishness.

A solution? Motivation building; purpose finding; first within the self, and then within the movement; awakening individuals to the light of truth, that each of us, however hard we try and stifle it, has a voice,….

It is my proposal that most cities should have two outdoor occupations, one which is arranged intentionally, perhaps with larger living spaces so that motivated people can meet, and live together, effectively, so that they can thrive and stay on message; then, another which the city can police, while empathetic individuals with an inclination to work on some of society’s largest problems, that being substance abuse and homelessness, can step in and work directly with the problems which are currently pushed under the rug, or swept outdoors; for, if we simply allow the city to sweep up our mess, or worse, we turn those at risk of themselves back to the wilds of society, I fear, we, as a movement and philosophy, will be mortally dissatisfied.

I have yet to hear in any published language a disassociation of the 99% with the lowest rungs on the economic ladder; and I am grateful for that; while we attempt to bring down those at the top, let us not forget to bring up those at the bottom; even if it means getting dirty.

How the Occupation of Boston Could Fail.

Friday, November 18th, 2011

If the movement co-opts itself. If its GA’s and working group meetings stray further indoors, to hotel lobbies, food courts, office buildings, first in the name of comfort and convenience, how long before expense account lunches and deceit; closing the door on complete transparency, no matter how it is looked at, unless these meetings begin to record themselves, to use the technology, resources, and funds available to stream, or put up for review online all proceedings; I fear, it will be in the back room talks and deals that this new concept of society will strike the contract, perhaps even with the best of intentions at the time, which could instead however be only willing its own life away.

The camp may fail if the grounds on which the protesting bodies find their rest each night are left to the idle, discard, decay, refuse, spit and rubbish, lack of oversight or respect for decency, cleanliness, or dignity, which would be required to court the best and brightest amongst society to the cause,… if the lack of sunlight, the closely arranged personal living quarters are allowed to hang, to remain and to further degenerate,… to not be replaced with winterized; communized arrangements,.. finding in close quarters the heat necessary for it’s purpose; if further disregard for sound reason, or, if repeated advice on proper drainage and run off of individualized structures is ignored, in some cases arousing hostility when individuals are exposed to an education of techniques to achieve these draining and ground rejuvenation procedures is to continually be met with hostility,…. if everyone can not be taxed with cleaning up after themselves, and further, their fellow occupier, even if the causal observer can not be coached into leaving the area better than they had discovered it, perhaps handed a trash-bag upon entering the camp will fail for sanitation reasons.

If the protesting bodies can not, or will not consent to a course of action to prevent onsite alcohol and drug abuse, verbal harassment, sexual harassment, as well as violence prevention; along with it’s over crowding issues; if women do not feel safe; if the most empathetic and capable continue to socialize with one and other to the deterioration and detriment of the herd, without coming out with firm process and handle on the current situation, if the sacrifice of self necessary to steer the wagon from the quagmire can not be mustered the safety of the camp will be further jeopardized and its own longevity threatened.

If the tents and insulating materials, purposed and in some cases purchased, do not arrive on site, soon, the camp will fail for logistical reasons. More, if the funds can not be made available within a reasonable time frame, with attention to the fact the an occupy timeline should move much faster than one of standard business, the camp could fail for financial expediency and oversight issues.

If the camp chooses to go the route of litigation, asserting to claim its innate right to the space, without consideration of all of its uses of said space; IE, if its most capable continue to let themselves be bogged down with bureaucracy, designated specialized tasks, and sociability; while effectively ignoring the core issues which would require public health, sanitation, crime and social workers to force their own involvement, the camp will fail for bureaucratic reasons.

If the camp relies on individuals, or small groups, to solve its major/minor problems, while maintaining a leaderless platform to the public, the camp will fail/be co-opted for legitimacy reasons.

I believe with all of myself in the right to protest peacefully; however, I question the peace which allows its neighbor to act out violently, if even to themselves.